Yikes… If you didn’t catch Alice Kryzan’s interview on the Jerry Doyle Show on WYSL, then you missed something very disturbing. While most of the interview wasn’t very spectacular, there was one part that just really shocked me. In the segment devoted to foreign policy, Kryzan was asked for her thoughts on the war on terror. Her response was unbelievable:
“Llet me say this, first of all, I think that this concept of the war on terrorism is perhaps a misnomer. There are many people who believe that we should be attacking terrorism and terrorists more as a law enforcement and a policing issue, than an issue that our armed forced deal with… and i think there’s a lot to be said about that.”
There’s a lot to be said about that? Is Alice in her own liberal wonderland? How can she say seriously that fighting terrorism should be treated simply as a law enforcement issue? Does she think an indictment will bring Osama bin Laden out of hiding? Treating terrorism as a law enforcement issue was the failed approach of the Clinton Administration, which resulted in multiple attacks against this country, and revealed our tactics to the enemy.
Here’s an audio clip of Alice making her ridiculous statement:
Matt Margolis is co-author (with Mark Noonan) of Caucus of Corruption: The Truth About The New Democratic Majority. He also blogs at Blogs For Victory. Follow Matt on Twitter.
[...] Something tells me that EMILY’s List isn’t exactly going to be extraordinarily helpful to Kryzan in the 26th District. Her association with Planned Parenthood certainly won’t resonate well with the voters of a Republican-leaning district. Of course, I don’t see abortion being a big issue in this particular campaign, but there are other issues that will be, and she’s on wrong side of them. [...]